Hi Jeff, >> Redefining a previously defined static function as both public and >> weak triggers an ICE in ipa-visibility.c: >> >> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49899
> Does this fix a regression? How far back am I allowed to go ? :-) The bug as reported in the PR existed in 4.7.0. I suspect, but have not actually tested, that the bug has always been present. Hence I have to admit that it is probably not a regression. > Essentially I'm trying to figure out if we want this for gcc-6 or gcc-7. Technically I guess the patch ought to be for gcc-7. It just feels wrong to have a patch to fix a known bug, but not to be able to apply it because the bug has always existed... Cheers Nick
