Hi Honza, sorry for not being able to review the earlier version you had sent in a timely manner. This looks good (= please commit) once you made the two changes Jonathan suggested and the ones below.
And impressive list of contributions!! On Thu, 18 Feb 2016, Jan Hubicka wrote: > + <li><p>Linker plugin was extended to pass information about type of "The linker plugin..." > + binary produced to GCC back-end (that can be also manually controlled "to the GCC back end" (add an article, and omit the dash) > + properly confiugre code generator and support incremental "configure" "the code generator" > + <li>Linking by <code>ld -r</code> will result in object file "in an object file" > + This delays the actual linking to the time final binary is produced "the final binary" > + and thus permits whole program optimization. Linking such object > + file is however slower. "such an object" > + <li>Linking by <code>gcc -r</code> will lead to link time > optimization > + and produce final binary into the object file. Linking such object > + file is fast but avoids any benefirts from whole program > optimization.</li> I believe it's "linking with" (also in other cases). And I'm not sure, "produce final binary into the object file" feels a little odd. "such an object file" or "such object files"? "benefits" Gerald
