Hello Gerald, Could you please review my updated patch?
BR, Terry > -----Original Message----- > From: Terry Guo [mailto:terry....@arm.com] > Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2011 10:27 AM > To: 'Gerald Pfeifer' > Cc: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'; Richard Earnshaw; Matthew Gretton-Dann > Subject: RE: [wwwdocs] Announce new ARM/embedded-4_6-branch branch > > Ping. > > BR, > Terry > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Terry Guo [mailto:terry....@arm.com] > > Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 3:13 PM > > To: 'Gerald Pfeifer' > > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Richard Earnshaw; Matthew Gretton-Dann > > Subject: RE: [wwwdocs] Announce new ARM/embedded-4_6-branch branch > > > > Hi Gerald, > > > > Thanks for your review. Here I attached the updated one. Is it ok to > > commit? > > > > BR, > > Terry > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Gerald Pfeifer [mailto:ger...@pfeifer.com] > > > Sent: Monday, August 08, 2011 5:43 PM > > > To: Terry Guo > > > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Richard Earnshaw; Matthew Gretton-Dann > > > Subject: Re: [wwwdocs] Announce new ARM/embedded-4_6-branch branch > > > > > > Hi Terry, > > > > > > On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Terry Guo wrote: > > > > This new branch intends to provide fixes and enhancements for GCC > > 4.6 > > > > when used with ARM embedded cores. > > > > > > > > The attached patch adds documentation for this branch. > > > > > > thanks for thinking to document this! This looks good modulo two > > > notes. > > > > > > + <dd>This branch provides bug-fixes, minor enhancements and > > stability > > > + fixes for GCC-4.6 when used with ARM's embedded cores, such as > the > > > + Cortex-R and Cortex-M processors. Most patches will be back- > ports > > > + of changes already made on trunk. Patches should be marked with > > the > > > + tag <code>[arm-embedded]</code> in the subject line. The branch > > is > > > + maintained by ARM.</dd> > > > > > > Would you mind making ths GCC 4.6 (without the dash), and perhaps > > > noting which version of GCC 4.6 this is based on (or whether it > > > tracks the general GCC 4.6 branch)? > > > > > > As for maintainership, we usually have individuals, not companies > > > there. Could you name one or two (or three)? You can always > adjust > > > the list an any time later on, without any form of approval. > > > > > > Gerald > > >
