On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 03:16:49AM +0000, Stuart Brady wrote:
> As a brief aside, I do get an ICE with the following source, without any
> modifications of my own:
>
> int bar() { return foo(); }
> void baz(int c[foo()]) { return; }
>
> I will look into submitting a PR for this properly soon, but will not
> mind if someone wants to take this task upon themselves instead,
> especially as we are into the release phase for GCC 6 and this may be
> an issue worth fixing. (Note that Debian's GCC 5.3.1 is also affected.)
Sure, I've just filed this:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69824
> For a hypothetical change to the C standard itself, I think one might use
> the name "_ArraySize", but for a non-standard extension this would not be
> appropriate. I think "__array_size" is fine, though, and is consistent
> with "__alignof".
Please no CamelCase, that's ugly ;). I also think that "__array_size" is fine.
(I haven't had time so far to read the patch.)
Marek
