On 02/12/2016 04:27 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
I don't understand this comment. If we're pushing a reload of the inner reg, then the SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED code in push_reload will fire. Why then should there be any need to do anything special in find_reloads_address_1 regarding secondary memory?
The idea was to find out whether we needed to special case things. But, after looking at this area for a while, I think your original patch makes the most sense and the things I was worried about are non-issues. Please commit.
Bernd
