On 02/11/2016 08:43 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 10:16 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Bernd Schmidt <bschm...@redhat.com>
wrote:
On 02/09/2016 09:44 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
This is a bug in a new feature, so it isn't a regression as such,
but
it's fairly visible, and I believe the fix is relatively low-risk
(error-handling of typos of command-line options).
This also now covers PR driver/69453 (and its duplicate PR
driver/69642), so people *are* running into this.
I think the patch looks reasonable (I expect it needs slight
adjustment
after an earlier sanitizer options change). Whether it's OK or not
at this
stage is something I think I'll want to ask a RM. My inclination
would be
yes.
Yes.
Thanks. Were you approving the idea of fixing this bug in stage 4, or
approving the patch itself? Note that the patch needed some changes
to apply against trunk; the latest version is at:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg00724.html
I think the combination of Bernd's comments and Richi's "Yes" is enough
to consider this approved for the trunk.
jeff
