On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 12:24 PM, James Greenhalgh <james.greenha...@arm.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:24:14PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:40 PM, James Greenhalgh >> <james.greenha...@arm.com> wrote: >> > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 04:29:31PM +0300, Yuri Rumyantsev wrote: >> >> Hi James, >> >> >> >> Thanks for reporting this issue. >> >> I prepared slightly different patch since we don't need to add >> >> tree-vect dump option - it is on by default for all tests in /vect >> >> directory. >> > >> > Hm, I added that line as my test runs were showing: >> > >> > UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/vect/vect-mask-store-move-1.c: dump file does not >> > exist >> > >> > I would guess the explicit >> > >> > /* { dg-options "-O3" } */ >> > >> > is clobbering the vect.exp setup of flags? >> >> Yes. Use { dg-additional-options "-O3" } instead. > > I don't see why this test needs anything more than the default vect > options anyway... In which case, the patch would look like this. > > Tested on x86-64 where the test passes, and on AArch64 where it is > correctly skipped. > > OK?
Ok. Richard. > Thanks, > James > > --- > 2016-02-09 James Greenhalgh <james.greenha...@arm.com> > > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-mask-store-move-1.c: Drop dg-options directive, > gate check on x86_64/i?86. >