On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Richard Guenther <rguent...@suse.de> wrote: > On Wed, 10 Aug 2011, Richard Guenther wrote: > >> On Wed, 10 Aug 2011, Richard Guenther wrote: >> >> > On Wed, 10 Aug 2011, Jason Merrill wrote: >> > >> > > On 08/10/2011 08:35 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: >> > > > * call.c (build_over_call): Call memcpy unconditionally. >> > > >> > > OK. Have you tested the MEM_REF patch? >> > >> > No, not yet. I'll throw it to testing now. >> >> The following is what passed bootstrap sofar and is in testing now. > > With the patch SRA now causes g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr41186.C to be fully > optimized, making FRE useless. Thus the patch needs to disable SRA > when testing for FRE features. This is somewhat expected as > when no longer using memcpy nothing keeps the source/destination > having their address taken and thus they get exposed to SRA. > > Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, ok for trunk? > > Thanks, > Richard. > > 2011-08-11 Richard Guenther <rguent...@suse.de> > > cp/ > * call.c (build_over_call): Instead of memcpy use an > assignment of two MEM_REFs. >
This caused: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50058 -- H.J.
