in ix86_split_long_move (i386.c:24353) with -fno-split-wide-types -mavx
Reply-To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.to...@gmail.com>

r229087, which caused PR 69530, was supposed to fix PR 67609.  r229458
has made r229087 unnecessary.

Approved by Vladimir in PR 69530.  Checked into trunk.


H.J.
---
gcc/

        PR target/69530
        * lra-splill.c (lra_final_code_change): Revert r229087 by
        removing all sub-registers.

gcc/testsuite/

        PR target/69530
        * gcc.target/i386/pr69530.c: New test.
---
 gcc/lra-spills.c                        | 46 ++++++---------------------------
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69530.c | 11 ++++++++
 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69530.c

diff --git a/gcc/lra-spills.c b/gcc/lra-spills.c
index fa0a579..5709ef1 100644
--- a/gcc/lra-spills.c
+++ b/gcc/lra-spills.c
@@ -760,44 +760,14 @@ lra_final_code_change (void)
          
          struct lra_static_insn_data *static_id = id->insn_static_data;
          bool insn_change_p = false;
-         
-          for (i = id->insn_static_data->n_operands - 1; i >= 0; i--)
-           {
-             if (! DEBUG_INSN_P (insn) && static_id->operand[i].is_operator)
-               continue;
-             
-             rtx op = *id->operand_loc[i];
-             
-             if (static_id->operand[i].type == OP_OUT
-                 && GET_CODE (op) == SUBREG && REG_P (SUBREG_REG (op))
-                 && ! LRA_SUBREG_P (op))
-               {
-                 hard_regno = REGNO (SUBREG_REG (op));
-                 /* We can not always remove sub-registers of
-                    hard-registers as we may lose information that
-                    only a part of registers is changed and
-                    subsequent optimizations may do wrong
-                    transformations (e.g. dead code eliminations).
-                    We can not also keep all sub-registers as the
-                    subsequent optimizations can not handle all such
-                    cases.  Here is a compromise which works.  */
-                 if ((GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (op))
-                      < GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (SUBREG_REG (op))))
-                     && (hard_regno_nregs[hard_regno][GET_MODE (SUBREG_REG 
(op))]
-                         == hard_regno_nregs[hard_regno][GET_MODE (op)])
-#ifdef STACK_REGS
-                     && (hard_regno < FIRST_STACK_REG
-                         || hard_regno > LAST_STACK_REG)
-#endif
-                     )
-                   continue;
-               }
-             if (alter_subregs (id->operand_loc[i], ! DEBUG_INSN_P (insn)))
-               {
-                 lra_update_dup (id, i);
-                 insn_change_p = true;
-               }
-           }
+
+         for (i = id->insn_static_data->n_operands - 1; i >= 0; i--)
+           if ((DEBUG_INSN_P (insn) || ! static_id->operand[i].is_operator)
+               && alter_subregs (id->operand_loc[i], ! DEBUG_INSN_P (insn)))
+             {
+               lra_update_dup (id, i);
+               insn_change_p = true;
+             }
          if (insn_change_p)
            lra_update_operator_dups (id);
        }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69530.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69530.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9146d1d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69530.c
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+/* { dg-do compile { target int128 } } */
+/* { dg-options "-O -fno-forward-propagate -fno-split-wide-types -mavx " } */
+
+typedef unsigned __int128 v32u128 __attribute__ ((vector_size (32)));
+
+v32u128
+foo (v32u128 v32u128_0)
+{
+  v32u128_0[0] *= v32u128_0[1];
+  return v32u128_0;
+}
-- 
2.5.0

Reply via email to