James Greenhalgh <[email protected]> wrote:
> If we don't have any targets which care about the fccmps/fccmpd split in
> the code base, do we really need it? Can we just follow the example of
> fcsel?
If we do that then we should also change fcmps/d to fcmp to keep the f(c)cmp
attributes orthogonal. However it seems better to have all FP operations use
{s|d} postfix as the convention (rather than assume that all current and future
microarchitectures will treat float and double identically on all operations),
so fcsel should ideally be fixed.
Wilco
