On Wed, 20 Jan 2016, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> writes: > > > + "memory input %d is not directly addressable", > > What does that mean?
Is "input %d is not addressable" better? Otherwise the patch looks ok. Richard.
On Wed, 20 Jan 2016, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> writes: > > > + "memory input %d is not directly addressable", > > What does that mean?
Is "input %d is not addressable" better? Otherwise the patch looks ok. Richard.