When adjusting the C++ FE code generation for base type copies
I noticed the XFAILs on g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr41186.C and investigated
things a bit.  We can fix the testcase easily iff the frontend
emits the MEM_REF variants, thus the following patch.

Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied to trunk.

Richard.

2011-08-11  Richard Guenther  <rguent...@suse.de>

        * tree-ssa-sccvn.c (vn_reference_lookup_3): Avoid redundant
        lookups, make looking through aggregate copies stronger.

Index: gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c
===================================================================
*** gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c        (revision 177649)
--- gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c        (working copy)
*************** vn_reference_lookup_3 (ao_ref *ref, tree
*** 1351,1367 ****
      {
        VEC (vn_reference_op_s, heap) *tem;
        tree lhs = gimple_assign_lhs (def_stmt);
        /* Avoid re-allocation overhead.  */
        VEC_truncate (vn_reference_op_s, lhs_ops, 0);
        copy_reference_ops_from_ref (lhs, &lhs_ops);
        tem = lhs_ops;
!       lhs_ops = valueize_refs (lhs_ops);
        gcc_assert (lhs_ops == tem);
!       lhs_ref_ok = ao_ref_init_from_vn_reference (&lhs_ref, get_alias_set 
(lhs),
!                                                 TREE_TYPE (lhs), lhs_ops);
!       if (lhs_ref_ok
!         && !refs_may_alias_p_1 (ref, &lhs_ref, true))
!       return NULL;
      }
  
    base = ao_ref_base (ref);
--- 1351,1377 ----
      {
        VEC (vn_reference_op_s, heap) *tem;
        tree lhs = gimple_assign_lhs (def_stmt);
+       bool valueized_anything = false;
        /* Avoid re-allocation overhead.  */
        VEC_truncate (vn_reference_op_s, lhs_ops, 0);
        copy_reference_ops_from_ref (lhs, &lhs_ops);
        tem = lhs_ops;
!       lhs_ops = valueize_refs_1 (lhs_ops, &valueized_anything);
        gcc_assert (lhs_ops == tem);
!       if (valueized_anything)
!       {
!         lhs_ref_ok = ao_ref_init_from_vn_reference (&lhs_ref,
!                                                     get_alias_set (lhs),
!                                                     TREE_TYPE (lhs), lhs_ops);
!         if (lhs_ref_ok
!             && !refs_may_alias_p_1 (ref, &lhs_ref, true))
!           return NULL;
!       }
!       else
!       {
!         ao_ref_init (&lhs_ref, lhs);
!         lhs_ref_ok = true;
!       }
      }
  
    base = ao_ref_base (ref);
*************** vn_reference_lookup_3 (ao_ref *ref, tree
*** 1469,1474 ****
--- 1479,1498 ----
          j--;
        }
  
+       /* ???  The innermost op should always be a MEM_REF and we already
+          checked that the assignment to the lhs kills vr.  Thus for
+        aggregate copies using char[] types the vn_reference_op_eq
+        may fail when comparing types for compatibility.  But we really
+        don't care here - further lookups with the rewritten operands
+        will simply fail if we messed up types too badly.  */
+       if (j == 0 && i == 0
+         && VEC_index (vn_reference_op_s, lhs_ops, 0)->opcode == MEM_REF
+         && VEC_index (vn_reference_op_s, vr->operands, i)->opcode == MEM_REF
+         && tree_int_cst_equal
+              (VEC_index (vn_reference_op_s, lhs_ops, 0)->op0,
+               VEC_index (vn_reference_op_s, vr->operands, i)->op0))
+       i--, j--;
+ 
        /* i now points to the first additional op.
         ???  LHS may not be completely contained in VR, one or more
         VIEW_CONVERT_EXPRs could be in its way.  We could at least
Index: gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr41186.C
===================================================================
*** gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr41186.C     (revision 177649)
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr41186.C     (working copy)
***************
*** 1,5 ****
  /* { dg-do compile } */
! /* { dg-options "-O -fdump-tree-fre1-details" } */
  
  struct Foo {
    Foo() {};
--- 1,5 ----
  /* { dg-do compile } */
! /* { dg-options "-O -fno-tree-sra -fdump-tree-fre1-details" } */
  
  struct Foo {
    Foo() {};
*************** int main()
*** 30,35 ****
  }
  
  /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Replaced b1.b with 1" "fre1" } } */
! /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Replaced b1.i with 0" "fre1" { xfail *-*-* } 
} } */
! /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Replaced b1.f with 1" "fre1" { xfail *-*-* } 
} } */
  /* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "fre1" } } */
--- 30,35 ----
  }
  
  /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Replaced b1.b with 1" "fre1" } } */
! /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Replaced b1.D.\[0-9\]*.i with 0" "fre1" } } */
! /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Replaced b1.D.\[0-9\]*.f with 1" "fre1" } } */
  /* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "fre1" } } */

Reply via email to