On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 03:37:02PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > Agreed. As we already have a flag that can be used as a workaround I don't
> > see
> > a reason to add another more specific one. That just makes it a
> > lesser incentive
> > for people to fix their code.
>
> Well, -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks is a big hammer, that disables way
> to many optimizations than really necessary.
But then perhaps it will be better incentive for the projects to fix their
cruft. With a specialized option they will keep broken code forever.
Jakub
