On Wednesday, January 13, 2016 06:39:20 PM Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 01/12/2016 08:55 AM, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> > On Monday, January 11, 2016 04:57:18 PM Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> >> On 01/08/2016 10:33 AM, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> >>> 2016-01-08 Thomas Preud'homme <thomas.preudho...@arm.com>
> >>>
> >>> * g++.dg/pr67989.C: Remove ARM-specific option.
> >>> * gcc.target/arm/pr67989.C: New file.
> >>
> >> I checked some other arm tests and they have things like
> >>
> >> /* { dg-skip-if "avoid conflicting multilib options" { *-*-* } {
> >> "-march=*" } { "-march=armv4t" } } */
> >> /* { dg-skip-if "avoid conflicting multilib options" { *-*-* } {
> >> "-mthumb" } { "" } } */
> >>
> >> Do you need the same in your testcase?
> >
> > That was the first approach I took but Kyrill suggested me to use
> > arm_arch_v4t and arm_arch_v4t_ok machinery instead. It should take care
> > about whether the architecture can be selected.
>
> Hmm, the ones I looked at did use dg-add-options, but not the
> corresponding _ok requirement. So I think this is OK.
Just to make sure: ok as in OK to commit as is?
Best regards,
Thomas
