Dear Jakub, Thanks for that. OK by me too.
Paul On 14 January 2016 at 18:36, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 01/14/2016 07:35 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> >> Hi! >> >> I've bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux the following >> fix >> from Francois that has been sitting in the PR for a few months. >> The problem is that the testcase assumed that the last real_kind >> has maximum precision and maximum range. That is usually the case, >> but is not the case with the insane double double format, which has >> LDBL_MIN > DBL_MIN. >> The intention is to test the behavior with too large precisions or ranges, >> 100 times the max precision or range safely hits that case. >> >> Ok for trunk? >> >> 2016-01-14 Francois-Xavier Coudert <fxcoud...@gcc.gnu.org> >> >> PR testsuite/67509 >> * gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_7.f90: For out of bound precision or >> range tests use 100 * maximum instead of maximum + 1. > > OK. > jeff > -- The difference between genius and stupidity is; genius has its limits. Albert Einstein
