On 11/01/16 16:39, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 05:11:21PM +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote:
I tested a similar version on my side. It just makes the test become
UNSUPPORTED for arm/aarch64 + newlib. They used to pass, though.
Is anything bad on that? The test tests functions that newlib does not
implement, so it is not wrong not to optimize those.
hm i didn't set function_* support for musl libc
because previously these were only used for invalid
optimizations (fast-math).
if they are used for valid optimizations too then
they should be defined correctly for other libcs too
i guess.
