On 12/18/2015 08:05 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 19:21 +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 12/17/2015 07:32 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
+ if (close_paren_loc)
close_paren_loc != UNKNOWN_LOCATION - it's very confusing otherwise.
Bernd
Here's an updated version; the only change since v1 is:
- if (close_paren_loc)
+ if (close_paren_loc != UNKNOWN_LOCATION)
Have verified the fix in valgrind. OK for trunk if it still passes
bootstrap®rtest?
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* parser.c (cp_parser_postfix_expression): Initialize
close_paren_loc to UNKNOWN_LOCATION; only use it if
it has been written to by
cp_parser_parenthesized_expression_list.
(cp_parser_postfix_dot_deref_expression): Likewise.
(cp_parser_parenthesized_expression_list): Document the behavior
with respect to the CLOSE_PAREN_LOC param.
I usually like to leave C++ patches to Jason, but I guess I don't need
to know the standard inside out for this one.
Prior to your ealier patch, we had
protected_set_expr_location (postfix_expression, token->location);
It looks like after your new patch, we could end up not setting the
location on the expr at all if close_paren_loc is still
UNKNOWN_LOCATION. I'm guessing this is intentional as the comment update
suggests this is an error path, and the cp_expr constructor ensures that
we get at least UNKNOWN_LOCATION and not another uninitialized loc. If
I'm correct in all that, the patch is ok.
Bernd