On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:38:29AM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 12:46:17 +0300 (MSK), Alexander Monakov
> <amona...@ispras.ru> wrote:
> > On Fri, 8 Jan 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > And CU_JIT_TARGET / CU_TARGET_COMPUTE_30 requests JITting only on sm_30
> > > and
> > > nothing else, or just on sm_30 or later, something else?
> >
> > It requests to produce binary code targeting sm_30 devices. Newer (Maxwell)
> > devices use a different hw instruction set, so they simply cannot execute
> > binary code emitted/jitted for sm_30.
>
> ACK.
>
> > > This really should be reviewed by somebody familiar with CUDA more than
> > > myself.
> >
> > FWIW this is my patch -- I developed it as part of OpenMP offloading work,
> > and
> > I still think that the patch is doing the right thing.
>
> ACK, as I recently suggested/requested in
> <http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=%3C87h9j9gq2m.fsf%40kepler.schwinge.homeip.net%3E>.
>
> > (and I don't understand what's going on with lack of Changelog showing
> > attribution
>
> No offense intended I think -- I guess Jim simply forgot to include the
> ChangeLog update in this submission; you're certainly listed in his
> gomp-4_0-branch commit r232142,
> <http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=%3C568ED528.6080200%40codesourcery.com%3E>.
This patch is ok for trunk with proper attribution in the ChangeLog.
Jakub
