On Mon, 21 Dec 2015, Marek Polacek wrote: > Uuugh, sorry about that. Fixed in this version and I've added a run-time > test to verify this issue. In addition to that, I've also added a new test > that checks the size of lhs_type -- so that we know we can use some _N variant > of the atomic fetch built-in. > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and powerpc64le-linux, ok for trunk?
OK. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
