Hi, On Mon, 14 Dec 2015, Patrick Palka wrote:
> >>> >This should use cp_tree_operand_length. > >> Hmm, I don't immediately see how I can use this function here. It > >> expects a tree but I dont have an appropriate tree to give to it, only a > >> tree_code. > > > > True. So let's introduce cp_tree_code_length next to > > cp_tree_operand_length. > > > > Jason > > > > > > Like this? Incremental diff followed by patch v4: Not my turf, but if I may make a suggestion: please use the new function in the old one instead of duplicating the implementation. Ciao, Michael.
