On 12/14/2015 03:39 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
On 12/12/2015 01:42 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:

On Sat, 12 Dec 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 09:51:23AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:

On 12/11/2015 06:52 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 3:24 AM, Richard Biener
<richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:31 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf
<mar...@trippelsdorf.de> wrote:

On 2015.12.09 at 10:53 -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:


Empty C++ class is a corner case which isn't covered in psABI nor
C++ ABI.
There is no mention of "empty record" in GCC documentation.  But
there are
plenty of "empty class" in gcc/cp.  This change affects all
targets.  C++ ABI
should specify how it should be passed.



About this patch, aren't we supposed to enable new C++ ABIs with
-fabi-version=42 (or whatever the next number is)?


Yes, the patch should definitely make this conditional on
abi_version_at_least.

There is a C++ ABI mailinglist, where you could discuss this issue:
http://sourcerytools.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cxx-abi-dev


Yep.  As long as the ABI doesn't state how to pass those I'd rather
_not_ change GCCs way.


It is agreed that GCC is wrong on this:


http://sourcerytools.com/pipermail/cxx-abi-dev/2015-December/002876.html


Yes, I think this is just a (nasty) bug on some GCC targets.


Well, the argument in that thread is weird, because C and C++ empty
structs
are different, so it isn't surprising they are passed differently.
C++ makes those sizeof == 1, while C has them sizeof == 0.


Maybe it isn't surprising, but it isn't particularly helpful either. It
increases the number of places where the 2 are incompatible.
(I personally don't care about empty C structs)


Yep.  The C standard doesn't have empty structs; it's a GNU extension. But
in any case argument passing can be compatible between C and C++, so it
really should be.



Before I make any changes, I'd like to ask if we should make
argument passing can be compatible between C and C++ for
all targets GCC support or just x86.

All.

Jason

Reply via email to