On Sun, 6 Dec 2015, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> while looking at the handling of basic asm statements
> I noticed two minor glitches, which I want to fix now.
>
> First there is a missing check in compare_gimple_asm in ipa-icf-gimple.c
>
> Here we check if two asm statements are exactly identical,
> there is a possibility that one is a basic asm and the other is an
> extended asm with zero operands. Even if both have the same string
> the string means something slightly different, if % or { } are around.
>
> example:
>
> asm("%"); // OK
> asm("%":); // error: invalid 'asm': invalid %-code
>
>
> Boot-strapped and reg-tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu,
> OK for trunk?
Ok.
Richard.
