Bernd Schmidt <bschm...@redhat.com> writes:

> I'm worried we'll end up carrying
> something around as a burden that is of no practical use (considering
> we already support the more widespread OpenMP).

I'm not an expert on UPC, but from glancing over the description it
seems to target a distributed message passing programing model,
which is very different from OpenMP. I don't think any of the existing
parallelization models in gcc (OpenMP, cilk) support that niche.

-Andi
-- 
a...@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only

Reply via email to