Bernd Schmidt <bschm...@redhat.com> writes: > I'm worried we'll end up carrying > something around as a burden that is of no practical use (considering > we already support the more widespread OpenMP).
I'm not an expert on UPC, but from glancing over the description it seems to target a distributed message passing programing model, which is very different from OpenMP. I don't think any of the existing parallelization models in gcc (OpenMP, cilk) support that niche. -Andi -- a...@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only