On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 12:30:24PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > In the process of dealing with PR68513, it turned out this test should have
> > been written with GIMPLE in mind.
> >
> > Tested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?  Maybe we'll want this even for 5, I
> > don't know yet.
> 
> Ok.

I think it is just fine for 5 branch too.
You could even use int tem3 = ~m; and use tem3 instead of ~m if you really
wanted to test whether GIMPLE folding works.
> 
> > 2015-11-27  Marek Polacek  <pola...@redhat.com>
> >
> >         * gcc.dg/pr63568.c: Convert to GIMPLE.
> >
> > diff --git gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr63568.c gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr63568.c
> > index c6b88e7..5c688b0 100644
> > --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr63568.c
> > +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr63568.c
> > @@ -1,53 +1,69 @@
> >  /* PR middle-end/63568 */
> >  /* { dg-do compile } */
> > -/* { dg-options "-fdump-tree-original" } */
> > +/* { dg-options "-O -fdump-tree-cddce1" } */
> >
> >  int
> >  fn1 (int a, int b, int m)
> >  {
> > -  return (a & ~m) | (b & m);
> > +  int tem1 = a & ~m;
> > +  int tem2 = b & m;
> > +  return tem1 | tem2;
> >  }
> >
> >  int
> >  fn2 (int a, int b, int m)
> >  {
> > -  return (a & ~m) | (m & b);
> > +  int tem1 = a & ~m;
> > +  int tem2 = m & b;
> > +  return tem1 | tem2;
> >  }
> >
> >  int
> >  fn3 (int a, int b, int m)
> >  {
> > -  return (~m & a) | (m & b);
> > +  int tem1 = ~m & a;
> > +  int tem2 = m & b;
> > +  return tem1 | tem2;
> >  }
> >
> >  int
> >  fn4 (int a, int b, int m)
> >  {
> > -  return (~m & a) | (b & m);
> > +  int tem1 = ~m & a;
> > +  int tem2 = b & m;
> > +  return tem1 | tem2;
> >  }
> >
> >  int
> >  fn5 (int a, int b, int m)
> >  {
> > -  return (b & m) | (a & ~m);
> > +  int tem1 = b & m;
> > +  int tem2 = a & ~m;
> > +  return tem1 | tem2;
> >  }
> >
> >  int
> >  fn6 (int a, int b, int m)
> >  {
> > -  return (m & b) | (a & ~m);
> > +  int tem1 = m & b;
> > +  int tem2 = a & ~m;
> > +  return tem1 | tem2;
> >  }
> >
> >  int
> >  fn7 (int a, int b, int m)
> >  {
> > -  return (m & b) | (~m & a);
> > +  int tem1 = m & b;
> > +  int tem2 = ~m & a;
> > +  return tem1 | tem2;
> >  }
> >
> >  int
> >  fn8 (int a, int b, int m)
> >  {
> > -  return (b & m) | (~m & a);
> > +  int tem1 = b & m;
> > +  int tem2 = ~m & a;
> > +  return tem1 | tem2;
> >  }
> >
> > -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not " \\| " "original" } } */
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not " \\| " "cddce1" } } */
> >
> >         Marek

        Jakub

Reply via email to