On 08/05/2011 01:04 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
Jason Merrill<ja...@redhat.com> writes:
Why not 0xFFFFFFFF? I'm not sure what the rationale for using that
value here:
/* If the column number is ridiculous or we've allocated a huge
number of source_locations, give up on column numbers. */
max_column_hint = 0;
- if (highest>0xF0000000)
+ if (highest> MAX_SOURCE_LOCATION)
return 0;
was, but I would think that we would be fine to use that upper range
for macro maps.
I have no idea where the 0xF0000000 comes from. I have now set it to
0xFFFFFFFF and it passed bootstrap + tests fine.
Sorry, I should have been clearer; I think we want to leave this test
alone so that ordinary locations don't grow past 0xF0000000, leaving the
top range for macro locations.
Jason
