On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 02:10:35PM -0800, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> 
> Because the imp and parts are really integer rather than strings, this patch
> moves the comparisons to be integer.  Also allows saving around integers are
> easier than doing string comparisons.  This allows for the next change.
> 
> The way I store BIG.little is (big<<12)|little as each part num is only 12bits
> long.  So it would be nice if someone could test -mpu=native on a big.little
> system to make sure it works still.
> 
> OK?  Bootstrapped and tested on aarch64-linux-gnu with no regressions.
> 
> Thanks,
> Andrew Pinski
> 
> 
> 
> * config/aarch64/aarch64-cores.def: Rewrite so IMP and PART are integer 
> constants.
> * config/aarch64/driver-aarch64.c (struct aarch64_core_data): Change 
> implementer_id to unsigned char.
> Change part_no to unsigned int.
> (AARCH64_BIG_LITTLE): New define.
> (INVALID_IMP): New define.
> (INVALID_CORE): New define.
> (cpu_data): Change the last element's implementer_id and part_no to integers.
> (valid_bL_string_p): Rewrite to ..
> (valid_bL_core_p): this for integers instead of strings.
> (parse_field): New function.
> (contains_string_p): Rewrite to ...
> (contains_core_p): this for integers and only for the part_no.
> (host_detect_local_cpu): Rewrite handling of implementation and part num to 
> be integers;
> simplifying the code.
> ---
>  gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-cores.def | 25 +++++-----
>  gcc/config/aarch64/driver-aarch64.c  | 90 
> ++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-cores.def 
> b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-cores.def
> index 0b456f7..798f3e3 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-cores.def
> +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-cores.def
> @@ -33,25 +33,26 @@
>     This need not include flags implied by the architecture.
>     COSTS is the name of the rtx_costs routine to use.
>     IMP is the implementer ID of the CPU vendor.  On a GNU/Linux system it can
> -   be found in /proc/cpuinfo.
> +   be found in /proc/cpuinfo.  There is a list in the ARM ARM.

Let's be precise with this comment.

  "A partial list of implementer IDs is given in the ARM Architecture
   Reference Manual ARMv8, for ARMv8-A architecture profile"

>     PART is the part number of the CPU.  On a GNU/Linux system it can be found
> -   in /proc/cpuinfo.  For big.LITTLE systems this should have the form at of
> -   "<big core part number>.<LITTLE core part number>".  */
> +   in /proc/cpuinfo.  For big.LITTLE systems this should use the macro 
> AARCH64_BIG_LITTLE
> +   where the big part number comes as the first arugment to the macro and 
> little is the

s/arugment/argument/.

> +   second.  */
>  
>  /* V8 Architecture Processors.  */
>  
> -AARCH64_CORE("cortex-a53",  cortexa53, cortexa53, 8A,  AARCH64_FL_FOR_ARCH8 
> | AARCH64_FL_CRC, cortexa53, "0x41", "0xd03")
> -AARCH64_CORE("cortex-a57",  cortexa57, cortexa57, 8A,  AARCH64_FL_FOR_ARCH8 
> | AARCH64_FL_CRC, cortexa57, "0x41", "0xd07")
> -AARCH64_CORE("cortex-a72",  cortexa72, cortexa57, 8A,  AARCH64_FL_FOR_ARCH8 
> | AARCH64_FL_CRC, cortexa72, "0x41", "0xd08")
> -AARCH64_CORE("exynos-m1",   exynosm1,  cortexa57, 8A,  AARCH64_FL_FOR_ARCH8 
> | AARCH64_FL_CRC | AARCH64_FL_CRYPTO, cortexa72, "0x53", "0x001")
> -AARCH64_CORE("qdf24xx",     qdf24xx,   cortexa57, 8A,  AARCH64_FL_FOR_ARCH8 
> | AARCH64_FL_CRC | AARCH64_FL_CRYPTO, cortexa57, "0x51", "0x800")
> -AARCH64_CORE("thunderx",    thunderx,  thunderx,  8A,  AARCH64_FL_FOR_ARCH8 
> | AARCH64_FL_CRC | AARCH64_FL_CRYPTO, thunderx,  "0x43", "0x0a1")
> -AARCH64_CORE("xgene1",      xgene1,    xgene1,    8A,  AARCH64_FL_FOR_ARCH8, 
> xgene1, "0x50", "0x000")
> +AARCH64_CORE("cortex-a53",  cortexa53, cortexa53, 8A,  AARCH64_FL_FOR_ARCH8 
> | AARCH64_FL_CRC, cortexa53, 0x41, 0xd03)
> +AARCH64_CORE("cortex-a57",  cortexa57, cortexa57, 8A,  AARCH64_FL_FOR_ARCH8 
> | AARCH64_FL_CRC, cortexa57, 0x41, 0xd07)
> +AARCH64_CORE("cortex-a72",  cortexa72, cortexa57, 8A,  AARCH64_FL_FOR_ARCH8 
> | AARCH64_FL_CRC, cortexa72, 0x41, 0xd08)
> +AARCH64_CORE("exynos-m1",   exynosm1,  cortexa57, 8A,  AARCH64_FL_FOR_ARCH8 
> | AARCH64_FL_CRC | AARCH64_FL_CRYPTO, cortexa72, 0x53, 0x001)
> +AARCH64_CORE("qdf24xx",     qdf24xx,   cortexa57, 8A,  AARCH64_FL_FOR_ARCH8 
> | AARCH64_FL_CRC | AARCH64_FL_CRYPTO, cortexa57, 0x51, 0x800)
> +AARCH64_CORE("thunderx",    thunderx,  thunderx,  8A,  AARCH64_FL_FOR_ARCH8 
> | AARCH64_FL_CRC | AARCH64_FL_CRYPTO, thunderx,  0x43, 0x0a1)
> +AARCH64_CORE("xgene1",      xgene1,    xgene1,    8A,  AARCH64_FL_FOR_ARCH8, 
> xgene1, 0x50, 0x000)
>  
>  /* V8 big.LITTLE implementations.  */
>  
> -AARCH64_CORE("cortex-a57.cortex-a53",  cortexa57cortexa53, cortexa53, 8A,  
> AARCH64_FL_FOR_ARCH8 | AARCH64_FL_CRC, cortexa57, "0x41", "0xd07.0xd03")
> -AARCH64_CORE("cortex-a72.cortex-a53",  cortexa72cortexa53, cortexa53, 8A,  
> AARCH64_FL_FOR_ARCH8 | AARCH64_FL_CRC, cortexa72, "0x41", "0xd08.0xd03")
> +AARCH64_CORE("cortex-a57.cortex-a53",  cortexa57cortexa53, cortexa53, 8A,  
> AARCH64_FL_FOR_ARCH8 | AARCH64_FL_CRC, cortexa57, 0x41, 
> AARCH64_BIG_LITTLE(0xd07, 0xd03))
> +AARCH64_CORE("cortex-a72.cortex-a53",  cortexa72cortexa53, cortexa53, 8A,  
> AARCH64_FL_FOR_ARCH8 | AARCH64_FL_CRC, cortexa72, 0x41, 
> AARCH64_BIG_LITTLE(0xd08, 0xd03))
>  
>  
>  #undef AARCH64_CORE
> diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/driver-aarch64.c 
> b/gcc/config/aarch64/driver-aarch64.c
> index d03654c..92388a9 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/driver-aarch64.c
> +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/driver-aarch64.c
> @@ -37,18 +37,23 @@ static struct arch_extension ext_to_feat_string[] =
>  struct aarch64_core_data
>  {
>    const char* name;
> -  const char* arch;
> -  const char* implementer_id;
> -  const char* part_no;
> +  const char *arch;
> +  unsigned char implementer_id; /* Exactly 8 bits */

Can we redesign this around the most general case - big.LITTLE cores with
different implementer IDs? There is nothing in the architecture that would
forbid this, and Samsung recently announced that their Exynos 8 Octa 8890
which would support a combination of four of their custom cores with four ARM
Cortex-A53 cores.

 ( 
http://www.samsung.com/semiconductor/minisite/Exynos/w/mediacenter.html#?v=news_Samsung_Unveils_a_New_Exynos_8_Octa_Processor_based_on_advanced_14-Nanometer_FinFET_Process_Technology
 )

> +  unsigned int part_no; /* 12 bits + 12 bits */
>  };
>  
> +#define AARCH64_BIG_LITTLE(BIG, LITTLE) \
> +  (((BIG)&0xFFFu) << 12 | ((LITTLE) & 0xFFFu))
> +#define INVALID_IMP ((unsigned char) -1)
> +#define INVALID_CORE ((unsigned)-1)
> +
>  #define AARCH64_CORE(CORE_NAME, CORE_IDENT, SCHED, ARCH, FLAGS, COSTS, IMP, 
> PART) \
>    { CORE_NAME, #ARCH, IMP, PART },
>  
>  static struct aarch64_core_data cpu_data [] =
>  {
>  #include "aarch64-cores.def"
> -  { NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL }
> +  { NULL, NULL, INVALID_IMP, INVALID_CORE }
>  };
>  
>  
> @@ -91,27 +96,35 @@ get_arch_name_from_id (const char* id)
>     should return true.  */
>  
>  static bool
> -valid_bL_string_p (const char** core, const char* bL_string)
> +valid_bL_core_p (unsigned int *core, unsigned int bL_core)
>  {
> -  return strstr (bL_string, core[0]) != NULL
> -         && strstr (bL_string, core[1]) != NULL;
> +  return AARCH64_BIG_LITTLE (core[0], core[1]) == bL_core;
>  }
>  
> -/*  Return true iff ARR contains STR in one of its two elements.  */
>  
> -static bool
> -contains_string_p (const char** arr, const char* str)
> +/* Returns the integer that is after ':' for the field. */
> +static unsigned parse_field (const char *field)
>  {
> -  bool res = false;
> +  const char *rest = strchr (field, ':');
> +  char *after;
> +  unsigned fint = strtol (rest+1, &after, 16);
> +  if (after == rest+1)

"rest + 1" in both cases.

> +    return -1;
> +  return fint;
> +}
> +
> +/*  Return true iff ARR contains CORE, in either of the two elements. */
>  
> -  if (arr[0] != NULL)
> +static bool
> +contains_core_p (unsigned *arr, unsigned core)
> +{
> +  if (arr[0] != INVALID_CORE)
>      {
> -      res = strstr (arr[0], str) != NULL;
> -      if (res)
> -        return res;
> +      if (arr[0] == core)
> +        return true;
>  
> -      if (arr[1] != NULL)
> -        return strstr (arr[1], str) != NULL;
> +      if (arr[1] != INVALID_CORE)
> +        return arr[1] == core;
>      }
>  
>    return false;
> @@ -146,10 +159,9 @@ host_detect_local_cpu (int argc, const char **argv)
>    bool cpu = false;
>    unsigned int i = 0;
>    unsigned int core_idx = 0;
> -  const char* imps[2] = { NULL, NULL };
> -  const char* cores[2] = { NULL, NULL };
> +  unsigned char imp = INVALID_IMP;
> +  unsigned int cores[2] = { INVALID_CORE, INVALID_CORE };
>    unsigned int n_cores = 0;
> -  unsigned int n_imps = 0;
>    bool processed_exts = false;
>    const char *ext_string = "";
>  
> @@ -180,30 +192,28 @@ host_detect_local_cpu (int argc, const char **argv)
>      {
>        if (strstr (buf, "implementer") != NULL)
>       {
> -       for (i = 0; cpu_data[i].name != NULL; i++)
> -         if (strstr (buf, cpu_data[i].implementer_id) != NULL
> -                && !contains_string_p (imps, cpu_data[i].implementer_id))
> -           {
> -                if (n_imps == 2)
> -                  goto not_found;
> -
> -                imps[n_imps++] = cpu_data[i].implementer_id;
> -
> -                break;
> -           }
> -          continue;
> +       unsigned cimp = parse_field (buf);
> +       if (cimp == INVALID_IMP)
> +         goto not_found;
> +
> +       if (imp == INVALID_IMP)
> +         imp = cimp;
> +       /* BIG.little implementers are always equal. */

See my comment above. This comment does not neccessarily hold.

In addition, this needs updating for Kyrill's comments.

Thanks,
James
 

Reply via email to