Hi!

On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 21:22:11 +0100, Bernd Schmidt <bschm...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 11/13/2015 09:06 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> > On 11/11/15 09:19, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> >> On 11/11/2015 02:59 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> >>> That's not the problem.  How to conditionally enable the test is the
> >>> difficulty.  I suspect porting something concerning accel_compiler from
> >>> the libgomp testsuite is needed?
> >>
> >> Maybe a check_effective_target_offload_nvptx which tries to see if
> >> -foffload=nvptx gives an error (I would hope it does if it's
> >> unsupported).
> >
> > This patch seems to do the trick.  tested on  an offload-aware build
> > (passes), and a regular x86_64-linux build (skipped as unsupported).

Thanks for adding such tests!

> I think this is fine.

I may have pointed this out before a few times... ;-) --
<http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=%3C8737wcv4lg.fsf%40kepler.schwinge.homeip.net%3E>
-- this doesn't work for build-tree testing ("make check"), if GCC has
not yet been installed ("make install"), which is still the default
testing procedure as far as I know.

    spawn [...]/build-gcc/gcc/xgcc -B[...]/build-gcc/gcc/ 
[...]/source-gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/goacc/nvptx-merged-loop.c 
-fno-diagnostics-show-caret -fdiagnostics-color=never -fopenacc -O2 
-foffload=-fdump-rtl-mach -dumpbase nvptx-merged-loop.c -Wa,--no-verify 
-ffat-lto-objects -lm -o nvptx-merged-loop.exe
    xgcc: error: libgomp.spec: No such file or directory
    compiler exited with status 1
    [...]
    FAIL: gcc.dg/goacc/nvptx-merged-loop.c (test for excess errors)
    [...]
    UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/goacc/nvptx-merged-loop.c scan-rtl-dump mach "Merging 
loop .* into "

Here, -fopenacc induces -lgomp.  So, we'll either need a (dummy?) libgomp
available to link against in gcc/testsuite/, or come up with a way to do
LTO/offloading compilation without actually linking (libgomp into) the
final executable, or move such tests into libgomp/testsuite/.  (Jakub?)


Grüße
 Thomas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to