On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > * it doesn't promise that GCC will never rely on undefined behavior > rules for signed left shifts
I think we should remove the ", but this is subject to change" in implement-c.texi (while replacing it with noting that ubsan will still diagnose such cases, and they will also be diagnosed where constant expressions are required). -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
