On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 03:16:37PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote: > On 11/03/2015 02:57 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote: > >On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 09:57:22AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote: > >>On 11/02/2015 06:26 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote: > >>>The attached patch fixes the annoying warnings generated by > >>>diagnostic_set_last_function. > >>Can you point out what warning you're fixing? > > > >Sure. toplec.c calls diagnostic_set_last_function with a NULL > >pointer as the second argument, and cp/typeck.c complains about > >it. Ah, it seems the *current* version of Gcc does not generate > >the warning, but the old one (4.8.5) I used to compile does. So, > >it may or may not be worth to apply the patch. > It looks like that was changed explicitly in 2014 (see the history > of g++.dg/abi/offsetof.C). I'm not a C++ expert, but it appears > this kind of use is considered OK these days.
All right, if this is the case it's not worth "fixing". I'll keep ignoring gcc-4.8's message. Ciao Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt IBM Germany
