> Evandro Menezes wrote:
> Hi, Wilco.
>
> It looks good to me, but FCMP is quite different from FCCMP on Exynos M1,
> so it'd be helpful to have distinct types for them. Say, "fcmp{s,d}"
> and "fccmp{s,d}". Would it be acceptable to add this with this patch or
> later?
It would be easy to add fccmps/d as new attributes, I prefer to do that as a
separate
patch. Are there any other attributes that you think are missing besides the
ones I know
about (extr, 64-bit mul/mla, mulh, bfi)?
Also would we need a new entry in the cost tables?
Wilco
