On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 07:37:17PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> I don't know which interface to implement to maintain compatibility in the
> future.
> Anyway, currently it's impossible that a process will use the same
> liboffloadmic
> for 2 different offloading paths (say GCC's in exec and ICC's in a dso),
> because
> in fact GCC's and ICC's libraries are not the same. First of all, they have
> different names: liboffloadmic in GCC and just liboffload in ICC. And most
> importantly, ICC's version contains some references to libiomp5, which were
> removed form GCC's version. In theory, we want to use one library with all
> compilers, but I'm not sure when it will be possible.
Ok, in that case it is less of a problem.
> > Do you get still crashes on any of the testcases with this?
>
> No, all tests now pass using emul. I'll report when I have any results on HW.
Perfect, I'll commit it to gomp-4_5-branch then.
Thanks.
Jakub
