On 11/08/2015 10:11 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On November 8, 2015 3:58:57 AM GMT+01:00, "Bin.Cheng" <amker.ch...@gmail.com> wrote:+inline bool +iv_common_cand_hasher::equal (const iv_common_cand *ccand1, + const iv_common_cand *ccand2) +{ + return ccand1->hash == ccand2->hash + && operand_equal_p (ccand1->base, ccand2->base, 0) + && operand_equal_p (ccand1->step, ccand2->step, 0) + && TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (ccand1->base)) + == TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (ccand2->base));Yes. Patch is OK then.
Doesn't follow the formatting rules though in the quoted piece. Bernd
