On 11/03/15 10:35, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 02:21:43PM -0500, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
--- gcc/c/c-parser.c    (revision 229667)
+++ gcc/c/c-parser.c    (working copy)
@@ -1160,7 +1160,8 @@ enum c_parser_prec {
  static void c_parser_external_declaration (c_parser *);
  static void c_parser_asm_definition (c_parser *);
  static void c_parser_declaration_or_fndef (c_parser *, bool, bool, bool,
-                                          bool, bool, tree *, vec<c_token>);
+                                          bool, bool, tree *, vec<c_token>,
+                                          tree);

Wonder if this shouldn't be tree = NULL_TREE, then you'd avoid most of the
c_parser_declaration_or_fndef caller changes.

yeah, I guess that'd be less invasive.  I'm fine with it.

Reply via email to