On October 29, 2015 4:37:08 PM GMT+01:00, Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana....@googlemail.com> wrote: >On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Renlin Li <renlin...@arm.com> wrote: >> Ping ~ >> >> Can somebody review it? Thank you! >> >> Regards, >> Renlin Li >> >> >> On 16/04/15 10:32, Renlin Li wrote: >>> >>> Ping~ >>> >>> Regards, >>> Renlin Li >>> >>> On 16/04/15 10:09, wrote: >>>> >>>> Ping~ >>>> Anybody has time to review it? >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Renlin Li >>>> >>>> On 06/02/15 17:48, Renlin Li wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> This is a backport patch for branch 4.9. You can find the >original=20 >>>>> patch >here:https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00356.html >>>>> And it has been commit on the trunk as r215205. >>>>> >>>>> This fixes a few libstdc++-v3 test suite failures. >>>>> x86_64 bootstraps Okay, aarch64_be-none-elf libstdc++-v3 tested >Okay. >>>>> >>>>> Okay to commit on branch 4.9? >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Renlin Li >>>>> >>>>> 2015-02-06 Renlin Li<renlin...@arm.com> >>>>> >>>>> Backport from mainline >>>>> 2014-09-12 Wilco Dijkstra<wilco.dijks...@arm.com> >>>>> >>>>> * gcc/ree.c (combine_reaching_defs): Ensure inserted copy >don't=20 >>>>> change >>>>> the number of hard registers. >>>>> >> > >richi - an RM question - > >Is this something that can be pulled back to GCC 4.9 branch assuming >testing still shows no regressions - it breaks aarch64 be on GCC 4.9
If it is a regression or wrong-code fix its OK with a test case. Richard. >... > > >regards >Ramana
