Hello Richard, Your commit to fix PR 65000 (pasted below) introduced gcc_assert (ri = (int)ri);
I'm unclear what is meant there; if equality test was meant, that looks suspicious to me because truncating conversion is implementation-defined. Can you please comment? (I found this after noticing assignment-in-assertion in nvptx.c, but apart from two instances there and this one, I didn't find others in GCC) Thanks. Alexander PR sanitize/65000 * tree-eh.c (mark_reachable_handlers): Mark source and destination regions of __builtin_eh_copy_values. git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@220626 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4 diff --git a/gcc/tree-eh.c b/gcc/tree-eh.c index 159fa2b..3c45f37 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-eh.c +++ b/gcc/tree-eh.c @@ -3859,6 +3859,17 @@ mark_reachable_handlers (sbitmap *r_reachablep, sbitmap *lp_reachablep) gimple_eh_dispatch_region ( as_a <geh_dispatch *> (stmt))); break; + case GIMPLE_CALL: + if (gimple_call_builtin_p (stmt, BUILT_IN_EH_COPY_VALUES)) + for (int i = 0; i < 2; ++i) + { + tree rt = gimple_call_arg (stmt, i); + HOST_WIDE_INT ri = tree_to_shwi (rt); + + gcc_assert (ri = (int)ri); + bitmap_set_bit (r_reachable, ri); + } + break; default: break; }