On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 4:20 AM, Bernd Schmidt <bschm...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 10/19/2015 09:55 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: >> >> * calls.c (prepare_call_address): Don't handle -fno-plt here. > > > Is any other target using -fno-plt? If not, and if that's really just a
aarch64 is the only target which checks -fno-plt from commit log below. I CCed the code author. aarch64 may suffer from the same issue. > revert I'll approve it on the condition that the x86 maintainers are happy > with the rest of the changes. Uros, can you take a look? > Your patch is word-wrapped. Sorry for that. Here is the link for the patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=patch;h=a116a4af073bb99c3117dae38f02d528815bc431 Thanks. -- H.J. --- Author: jiwang <jiwang@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4> Date: Thu Aug 6 16:02:16 2015 +0000 [AArch64] Tighten direct call pattern for sibcall to repair -fno-plt 2015-08-06 Jiong Wang <jiong.w...@arm.com> gcc/ * config/aarch64/constraints.md (Usf): Add the test of aarch64_is_noplt_call_p. gcc/testsuite/ * gcc.target/aarch64/noplt_3.c: New testcase. git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@226682 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4 commit 2bcb7473b37f9aa76e530f0a2007893489f61586 Author: jiwang <jiwang@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4> Date: Thu Aug 6 15:57:36 2015 +0000 [AArch64] Tighten direct call pattern to repair -fno-plt 2015-08-06 Jiong Wang <jiong.w...@arm.com> gcc/ * config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h (aarch64_is_noplt_call_p): New declaration. * config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_is_noplt_call_p): New function. * config/aarch64/aarch64.md (call_value_symbol): Check noplt scenarios. (call_symbol): Likewise. gcc/testsuite/ * gcc.target/aarch64/noplt_1.c: New testcase. * gcc.target/aarch64/noplt_2.c: Likewise. git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@226681 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
