On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Hurugalawadi, Naveen wrote: + (minus (bit_and:cs @0 (bit_not @1)) (bit_and:s @0 @1))
I am not sure why we have :c on one bit_and but not the other. + (bit_ior:c (bit_and:c @0 (bit_not @1)) (bit_and:c (bit_not @0) @1)) Here on the other hand, I believe the :c on bit_ior is redundant. -- Marc Glisse
