On 10/08/2015 08:52 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,

This series introduces autogeneration of vector comparison and its support on 
i386 target.  It lets comparison statements to be vectorized into vector 
comparison instead of VEC_COND_EXPR.  This allows to avoid some restrictions 
implied by boolean patterns.  This series applies on top of bolean vectors 
series [1].

This patch introduces optabs for vector comparison.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg00215.html

Thanks,
Ilya
--
gcc/

2015-10-08  Ilya Enkovich  <enkovich....@gmail.com>

        * expr.c (do_store_flag): Use expand_vec_cmp_expr for mask results.
        * optabs-query.h (get_vec_cmp_icode): New.
        * optabs-tree.c (expand_vec_cmp_expr_p): New.
        * optabs-tree.h (expand_vec_cmp_expr_p): New.
        * optabs.c (vector_compare_rtx): Add OPNO arg.
        (expand_vec_cond_expr): Adjust to vector_compare_rtx change.
        (expand_vec_cmp_expr): New.
        * optabs.def (vec_cmp_optab): New.
        (vec_cmpu_optab): New.
        * optabs.h (expand_vec_cmp_expr): New.
        * tree-vect-generic.c (expand_vector_comparison): Add vector
        comparison optabs check.


diff --git a/gcc/optabs-tree.c b/gcc/optabs-tree.c
index 3b03338..aa863cf 100644
--- a/gcc/optabs-tree.c
+++ b/gcc/optabs-tree.c
@@ -320,6 +320,19 @@ supportable_convert_operation (enum tree_code code,
    return false;
  }

+/* Return TRUE if appropriate vector insn is available
+   for vector comparison expr with vector type VALUE_TYPE
+   and resulting mask with MASK_TYPE.  */
+
+bool
+expand_vec_cmp_expr_p (tree value_type, tree mask_type)
+{
+  enum insn_code icode = get_vec_cmp_icode (TYPE_MODE (value_type),
+                                           TYPE_MODE (mask_type),
+                                           TYPE_UNSIGNED (value_type));
+  return (icode != CODE_FOR_nothing);
+}
+
Nothing inherently wrong with the code, but it seems like it's in the wrong place. Why optabs-tree rather than optabs-query?

I think with that fixed this patch will be ready to go onto the trunk.

jeff

Reply via email to