On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, Marek Polacek wrote: > Joseph noticed that we were wrongly accepting multiple attributes without > commas. Thus fixed by breaking out of the loop when parsing the attributes -- > if we don't see a comma after an attribute, then the next tokens must be )); > if > not, then the attribute is invalid. I've also added a few more comments. > > (I think it would be nicer to model the code after C++ and introduce > c_parser_attributes_list, but the following is enough to fix the bug.) > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
OK. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
