On October 14, 2015 6:27:02 PM GMT+02:00, Jan Hubicka <hubi...@ucw.cz> wrote: >Hi, >this patch adds the CONSTRUCTOR case discussed while back. Only empty >constructors are matched, as those are only appearing in gimple >operand. >I tested that during bootstrap about 7500 matches are for empty ctors. >There are couple hundred for non-empty probably used on generic. > >Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, OK? > >Honza > > * fold-const.c (operand_equal_p): Match empty constructors. >Index: fold-const.c >=================================================================== >--- fold-const.c (revision 228735) >+++ fold-const.c (working copy) >@@ -2890,6 +2891,11 @@ operand_equal_p (const_tree arg0, const_ > return operand_equal_p (TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 0), TREE_OPERAND (arg1, >0), > flags | OEP_ADDRESS_OF > | OEP_CONSTANT_ADDRESS_OF); >+ case CONSTRUCTOR: >+ /* In GIMPLE empty constructors are allowed in initializers of >+ vector types. */
The comment is wrong (or at least odd), On gimple an empty vector constructor should be folded to a VECTOR_CST. >+ return (!vec_safe_length (CONSTRUCTOR_ELTS (arg0)) >+ && !vec_safe_length (CONSTRUCTOR_ELTS (arg1))); > default: > break; > }