Done. Updated patch is attached. Thanks, K
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 4:49 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 5:36 AM, Kirill Yukhin <kirill.yuk...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi HJ, >> Thanks for input. I've missed it. >> Done. Updated patch is attached. > > Compiler may still optimize it away. You need to replace 0 with > a function parameter. Please see: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg02463.html > > > H.J. > --- >> Thanks, K >> >> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 4:26 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Kirill Yukhin <kirill.yuk...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> I've merged my changes with trunk (there was a conflict) and fixed typo. >>>> Updated patch is attached. Waiting for commit... >>>> >>>> Thanks, K >>>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Kirill Yukhin <kirill.yuk...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Thanks! >>>>> Guys with waa rights, could anybody commit my fix? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, K >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> OK for mainline. >>>>>> >>>>>> Uros. >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>> +# Return 1 if lzcnt instruction can be compiled. >>> +proc check_effective_target_lzcnt { } { >>> + return [check_no_compiler_messages lzcnt object { >>> + void _lzcnt (void) >>> + { >>> + __builtin_clzs (0); >>> + } >>> + } "-O2 -mlzcnt" ] >>> +} >>> >>> GCC may optimize this away. Please fix it similar to: >>> >>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg02463.html >>> >> >
lzcnt-6.gcc.patch
Description: Binary data
