> I think a FIELD_DECL with VOIDmode is odd. As I said in my earlier message, the FIELD_DECL does *not* have VOIDmode.
> And yes, the type of the COMPONENT_REF should be that of the FIELD_DECL (or > a variant type of it as we share FIELD_DECLs for record variants). But it is of course! Jan is apparently mixing up the LHS and the RHS here. -- Eric Botcazou
