On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 01:27:32PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> >I've removed obstack_ptr_grow for arrays with known sizes after this review:
> >https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg02210.html
>
> That's unfortunate, I think that made the code less future-proof. IMO we
> should revert to the obstack method especially if Thomas -v patch goes in.
Why? If the number of arguments is bound by a small constant, using
automatic fixed size array is certainly more efficient, and I really don't
see it as less readable or maintainable.
Jakub
