On 09/27/2015 01:57 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
On Wed, 9 Sep 2015, Mike Stump wrote:
On Sep 8, 2015, at 9:41 PM, David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> wrote:
+#define TARGET_LRA_P hook_bool_void_true
Are we at the point there this should be the default, and old
ports should just define to false, if they really need to?
I think no. For one, we don't have proper target documentation
updates for LRA. What does it need? What is outdated?
Also, give ample time for gcc releases of odd ports with LRA to
get into the public and cover most of the inevitable remaining
bugs. Not even sh has moved over due to remaining issues. Let
the reports come in - and be fixed. Let's revisit in a year or
two.
I don't think we're there yet either -- many ports still require some
guidance from Vlad to get working with LRA.
It *may* be time to decree that any new ports must use the LRA path
rather than reload. I'm still on the fence with that.
jeff
