On September 25, 2015 7:59:07 PM GMT+02:00, Andi Kleen <a...@firstfloor.org> wrote: >On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 11:01:47AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: >> On 09/25/2015 10:58 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote: >> >Woops, we crossed wires. I just committed this patch. Would you like >> >me to revert it? >> Leave it. If Andi can include a reversion if he can pound his work >> around 66890 into submission. > >The patch is stable, was just gathering more data.
+@item partition-cold-min-freq +When using doing function partitioning and there is no profile information +consider edges below this frequency cold. Setting to zero disables +any function splitting without profile information. Trouble parsing "using doing", nice hack otherwise. It's obviously a pity Google does its own thing and doesn't really push a balance between auto and such simple improvements. /me likes yours fwiw.. Cheers, > >> But I think it'd need some of the >> varasm.c work Jan hinted at. > >The varasm work should be only needed if no function splitting is done, >right? With my patch most functions do function splitting. > >-Andi
