On 09/23/15 04:02, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Hi!
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 11:29:37 -0400, Nathan Sidwell <nat...@acm.org> wrote:
I've committed this patch, which simplifies the generation of openacc reduction
code.
Aside from the progression mentioned in
<http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=%3C87d1x9zhz7.fsf%40kepler.schwinge.homeip.net%3E>,
this change is also causing a regression:
[-PASS:-]{+FAIL:+} c-c++-common/goacc/routine-7.c (test for errors, line
35)
[-PASS:-]{+FAIL:+} c-c++-common/goacc/routine-7.c (test for errors, line
58)
[-PASS:-]{+FAIL:+} c-c++-common/goacc/routine-7.c (test for errors, line
62)
[-PASS:-]{+FAIL:+} c-c++-common/goacc/routine-7.c (test for errors, line
81)
[-PASS:-]{+FAIL:+} c-c++-common/goacc/routine-7.c (test for errors, line
85)
[-PASS:-]{+FAIL:+} c-c++-common/goacc/routine-7.c (test for errors, line
89)
[-PASS:-]{+FAIL: c-c++-common/goacc/routine-7.c (internal compiler error)+}
{+FAIL:+} c-c++-common/goacc/routine-7.c (test for excess errors)
Odd. I didn't see any new fails. Will look
nathan
--
Nathan Sidwell
