On 07/26/2011 12:52 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
> This patch tests for at least one user-caused reason for this
> assertion failing - requiring a local frame in a naked function. For
> this case at least, it would be better to trigger an error than to
> ICE. OK?
>
> static int bar;
> void __attribute__((naked)) function(void) {
> int foo, result;
> result = subFunction(&foo, &bar); // ICE here
> }
>
> * expr.c (expand_expr_addr_expr_1): Detect a user request for
> a local frame in a naked function, and produce a suitable
> error for that specific case.
Err... why would naked affect anything at all this early in the
compilation path?
Without an answer to that, this seems like an odd place to patch.
r~
