On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 11:48 +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 7:26 AM, <tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org> wrote: > > From: Trevor Saunders <tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org> > > > > Hi, > > > > Personally I think hiding that variables are pointers is confusing, and I > > believe consensus is we should move away from this style. So this series > > starts to do that. > > Btw, what happened to the promised gimple -> gimple * conversion?
My recollection is that we hoped to do that after GCC 5 stage 1 closed (to avoid breaking people's development branchs), and I think I got distracted by other things (probably the jit). Sorry. I'm working on a big revamp of diagnostics (underlined ranges, fixit hints, etc) that I hope to get in for GCC 6 stage 1 and am trying to focus on that right now. If you think it's still worth doing the gimple -> gimple * conversion (presumably for immediately after close of stage 1), I can try out my scripts then. [snip discussion of Trevor's patches] Dave
