NightStrike <nightstr...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Rainer Orth
> <r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
>> The following two libgcc patches have seen almost no comments, and
>> certainly neither testing or review in a week:
>>
>> CFT: [build] Move fp-bit support to toplevel libgcc
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg00927.html
>>
>> CFT: [build] Move soft-fp support to toplevel libgcc
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg00931.html
>>
>> This patch will need to be updated for the recent addition of the c6x
>> port.
>>
>> Both will probably need build and libgcc maintainers and either a bunch
>> of target maintainers or a global reviewer. I wonder how to proceed
>> here: I've got a bunch of further libgcc patches in the works or
>> planned, but if I can't get them reviewed, there's no point in
>> continuing that work.
>
> Do you still need support?
No: I've since received review comments for both and am working to
incorporate them and complete the remaining libgcc build-related
patches.
What would help is target maintainers actually reviewing or trying the
patches. I'll probably wait until I've (re-)posted the full set and
start a new CFT then.
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
