On 14 Jul 2015, at 18:45, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
> On 14 Jul 2015, at 18:24, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
>> On 06/18/2015 04:12 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>>> The patch below pushes -static-libstdc++ onto the output command line (for
>>> targets without -Bstatic/dynamic) so that such specs have an opportunity
>>> to fire.
>>
>> Won't that produce an unrecognized flag error from the linker?
>
> IFF the target doesn't support -Bstatic/dynamic *and* doesn't provide a spec
> %{static-libstdc++:...
> then, that could happen.
>
> There's a fairly small group of non-binutils targets - other than Darwin that
> would be maybe AIX and some Solaris versions (and I believe that the native
> linkers there do support -Bstatic/dynamic), however, I'll double-check with
> the maintainers.
I checked with David (AIX) and Rainer (Solaris) as the only other two platforms
I could think of off-hand that use non-binutils linkers. Neither should be
affected by the change,
OK for trunk?
Iain
